Is the education accurate and appropriately bounded?
Review terminology, source citations, neighborhood context, relief guidance, and where users are directed back to official staff and records.
County evaluation
Questions before commitments.
NBHDer is designed to be evaluated in the same spirit as the product itself: clear scope, visible sources, explicit boundaries, and evidence before expansion.
The purpose of an evaluation is to learn whether NBHDer can support a county’s communication goals, technical environment, and resident experience—not to presume the answer.
Identify the resident questions, communication gaps, audiences, and official sources that matter locally.
Examine public fields, refresh expectations, privacy presentation, disclaimers, and system-of-record precedence.
Agree on coverage, labeling, stakeholders, feedback channels, and what the product should—and should not—demonstrate.
Review usage, resident questions, staff observations, limitations, and next-step evidence before considering expansion.
No single demo answers every stakeholder. A credible review makes room for professional judgment from each function.
Review terminology, source citations, neighborhood context, relief guidance, and where users are directed back to official staff and records.
Review hosting, public-data inputs, privacy presentation, operational responsibilities, accessibility, and the proposed integration footprint.
Define the problem, decision owners, evaluation criteria, documentation needs, and a realistic path if evidence supports continuing.